<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Twitter Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephanieromanski.com/2008/12/the-twitter-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephanieromanski.com/2008/12/the-twitter-revolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Sylvester</title>
		<link>http://www.stephanieromanski.com/2008/12/the-twitter-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Sylvester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 03:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephanieromanski.com/?p=67#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Great suggestions, Stephanie.  If you really take some care, copy edit yourself and post any corrections immediately, your editors will give you a break for posting live.  I cover trials live and it&#039;s worked very well.  We put some widgets on our web site so people can read my tweets without subscribing to Twitter, so it does create some traffic on our site.

But both me, and my editors, would second that reaching a new audience that neither looks at our web site or reads our newspaper but reacts to my live reports, is worth it.  Right now, that&#039;s valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great suggestions, Stephanie.  If you really take some care, copy edit yourself and post any corrections immediately, your editors will give you a break for posting live.  I cover trials live and it&#8217;s worked very well.  We put some widgets on our web site so people can read my tweets without subscribing to Twitter, so it does create some traffic on our site.</p>
<p>But both me, and my editors, would second that reaching a new audience that neither looks at our web site or reads our newspaper but reacts to my live reports, is worth it.  Right now, that&#8217;s valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
